
H. B. 4637



(By Delegates C. White, Compton, Webster,

Fleischauer, Dempsey, Hrutkay and Caputo)



[Introduced February 22, 2002; referred to the



Committee on Health and Human Resources then Finance.]
A BILL to amend chapter sixteen of the code of West Virginia, one
thousand nine hundred thirty-one, as amended, by adding
thereto a new article, designated article five-u, relating to
establishing the fair market drug pricing act.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:

That chapter sixteen of the code of West Virginia, one
thousand nine hundred thirty-one, as amended, be amended by adding
thereto a new article, designated article five-u, to read as
follows:
ARTICLE 5U. FAIR MARKET DRUG PRICING ACT.
§16-5U-1.
Short title.

This article may be cited as the "Fair Market Drug Pricing
Act."
§16-5U-2.
Findings and purpose.
(a) Findings. -- The Legislature finds that:

(1) The state of West Virginia pays substantially more than
the fair market price for many prescription drugs used in the
medicaid program. Considering the large volume of drugs purchased,
the state will receive better drug prices by entering into
voluntary negotiations with drug companies for supplemental rebates
above and beyond the federally-designated rebates.

(2) California and Florida currently have programs to
negotiate supplemental rebates. As a result, those states receive
better medicaid drug prices than West Virginia.

(3) In this time of economic difficulty, West Virginia needs
to maximize its financial resources in order to provide as much
health coverage as possible for low-income residents. Now more
than ever, West Virginia needs to lower the prices it pays for
prescription drugs.

(4) At the same time, approximately one in four West Virginia
residents are uninsured or underinsured for prescription drug
coverage, and do not qualify for medicaid. These uninsured or
underinsured residents pay excessive prices for prescription drugs.
In many cases, these excessive drug prices have the effect of denying residents access to medically necessary care, thereby
threatening their health and safety.

(5) Among these uninsured and underinsured residents, many
require repeated doctor or medical clinic appointments, having
gotten sicker because they cannot afford to take the drugs
prescribed for them. Many are admitted to or treated at hospitals
each year because they cannot afford the drugs prescribed for them
that could have prevented the need for hospitalization. Many
others enter expensive institutional care settings because they
cannot afford the prescription drugs that could have supported them
outside of an institution. In each of these circumstances,
uninsured and underinsured residents too often become medicaid
recipients because of their inability to afford prescription drugs.
Therefore, helping secure lower drug prices for the uninsured and
underinsured directly benefits and supports medicaid.

(6) The state government is the only agent that, as a
practical matter, can play an effective role as a market
participant on behalf of all residents who are uninsured,
underinsured or are medicaid beneficiaries. The state already
provides drugs and acts as a prescription benefits manager for a
variety of programs, and should expand that role to negotiate voluntary drug rebates, using these funds to maintain and expand
medicaid services while offering lower drug prices to the uninsured
who do not qualify for medicaid.

(b) Purpose. -- Recognizing that the state already acts as a
prescription benefits manager for a variety of health plans and
assistance programs, this law is enacted to cover new populations
by expanding the state's role as a participant in the prescription
drug marketplace, negotiating voluntary rebates from drug
companies, and using the funds to make prescription drugs more
affordable to the state medicaid program and to state residents.
This program will improve public health and welfare, promote the
economic strength of our society, and both directly and indirectly
benefit the state medicaid program.
§16-5U-3.
Definitions.

As used in this article:

(1) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Resources, or the Secretary's designee(s).

(2) "Department" means the Department of Health and Human
Resources.

(3) "Manufacturer" means a manufacturer of prescription drugs
as defined in 42 U.S.C. Section 1396r-8(k)(5), including a subsidiary or affiliate of a manufacturer.

(4) "Labeler" means an entity or person that receives
prescription drugs from a manufacturer or wholesaler and repackages
those drugs for later retail sale, and that has a labeler code from
the Food and Drug Administration under 21 Code of Federal
Regulations, 207.20 (1999).

(5) "Participating retail pharmacy" means a retail pharmacy or
other business licensed to dispense prescription drugs in this
state that: (A) Participates in the state Medicaid program; or (B)
voluntarily agrees to participate in the prescription card program.

(6) "Wholesaler" means a business licensed under article
eight, chapter sixty-a
of this code to distribute prescription
drugs in this state.
§16-5U-4.
Negotiated drug discounts and rebates.

(a) Drug discount and rebate agreements. -- The secretary
shall negotiate discount prices or rebates for prescription drugs
from drug manufacturers and labelers. A drug manufacturer or
labeler that sells prescription drugs in this state may voluntarily
elect to negotiate: (1) Supplemental rebates for the medicaid
program over and above those required under 42 U.S.C. Section
1396r-8; (2) discount prices or rebates for the prescription card program; and (3) discount prices or rebates for any other state
program that pays for or acquires prescription drugs.

(b) Rebate amounts. -- In negotiating rebate terms, the
secretary shall take into consideration: The rebate calculated
under the medicaid rebate program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section
1396r-8, the price provided to eligible entities under 42 U.S.C.
Section 256b, and any other available information on prescription
drug prices, discounts and rebates.

(c) Failure to agree. --

(1) The secretary shall prompt a review of whether to place a
manufacturer's or labeler's products on the prior authorization
list for the state medicaid program and take similar actions
involving prior authorization or formularies for any other
state-funded or operated prescription drug program, if:

(i) The secretary and a drug manufacturer or labeler fail to
reach agreement on the terms of a supplemental medicaid rebate or
a discount or rebate for the prescription card program; and

(ii) The discounts or rebates offered by the manufacturer or
labeler are not as favorable to the state as the prices provided to
eligible entities under 42 U.S.C. Section 256b.

(2) Any prior authorization must meet the requirements of 42 U.S.C. Section 1396r-8(d)(5) and be done in accordance with any
applicable provisions of this code. The secretary shall promulgate
rules creating clear procedures for the implementation of this
section.
§16-5U-5.
Administration.

(a) Discrepancies in rebate amounts. -- Disputes or
discrepancies in rebate amounts must be resolved using the process
established in this subsection.

(1) If there is a discrepancy in the manufacturer's or
labeler's favor between the amount claimed by a pharmacy and the
amount rebated by the manufacturer or labeler, the department, at
the department's expense, may hire a mutually agreed-upon
independent auditor. If a discrepancy still exists following the
audit, the manufacturer or labeler shall justify the reason for the
discrepancy or make payment to the department for any additional
amount due.

(2) If there is a discrepancy against the interest of the
manufacturer or labeler in the information provided by the
department to the manufacturer or labeler regarding the
manufacturer's or labeler's rebate, the manufacturer or labeler, at
the manufacturer's or labeler's expense, may hire a mutually agreed-upon independent auditor to verify the accuracy of the data
supplied to the department. If a discrepancy still exists
following the audit, the department shall justify the reason for
the discrepancy or provide a refund to the manufacturer or labeler.

(3) Following the procedures established in paragraph (a) or
(b), either the department or the manufacturer or labeler may
request a hearing. Supporting documentation must accompany the
request for a hearing.

(b) Annual summary report. -- The department shall report the
enrollment and financial status of the prescription card program
and report savings from supplemental medicaid rebates to the
Legislature by the first day of February of each year.

(c) Coordination with other programs. -- Where the secretary
finds that it is beneficial to both the prescription card program
and another state program, including the state medicaid program, to
combine drug pricing negotiations to maximize drug rebates, the
secretary shall do so.

(d) Rule making. -- The department shall adopt rules to
implement the provisions of this section.

(e) Waivers. -- The department may seek any waivers of federal
law, rule or regulation necessary to implement the provisions of this section.
§16-5U-6.
Severability.

If any provisions of this article or the application thereof
to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the invalidity
shall not affect other provisions or applications of the article
which can be given effect without the invalid provision or its
application and to this end the provisions of this article are
declared severable.
§16-5U-7.
Effective date.

This article shall take effect on the first day of July, two
thousand two and discounts to participants in the prescription card
program shall begin the first day of January, two thousand three.

NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to establish the Fair
Market Drug Pricing Act.

This article
is new; therefore, strike-throughs and
underscoring have been omitted.